Abductive Reasoning: Philosophical and Educational Perspectives in Medicine

  • Magnani L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to emphasize the significance of abduction in order to illustrate the problem solving process and to propose a unified epistemological model of medical reasoning. The paper introduces an epistemological model (Select and Test Model) of medical reasoning (diagnosis, therapy, monitoring) which can be described in terms of abduction (selective), deduction, and induction (Sect. 2). This model first describes the different roles played by these basic inference types in developing the various kinds of medical reasoning (Sect. 3), then is connected with cognitive models of medical reasoning (Sect. 4), and finally provides an abstract representation—an epistemological architecture (STMODEL)—of the control knowledge embedded in a medical Knowledge-Based System (KBS) (Sects. 3 and 5). Moreover, four meanings of the word abduction (creative, selective, automatic, to the best explanation) are discussed in order to clarify their significance in epistemology, psychological experimental research, and AI. In my opinion the controversial status of abduction is related to a confusion between the epistemological and cognitive levels, and to a lack of explanation as to why people sometimes deviate from normative epistemological principles.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Magnani, L. (1992). Abductive Reasoning: Philosophical and Educational Perspectives in Medicine. In Advanced Models of Cognition for Medical Training and Practice (pp. 21–41). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02833-9_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free