Grading AG Szpunar’s opinion in case C-18/18 – A caution against worldwide content blocking as default

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

On 4th of June 2019, Advocate General Szpunar delivered his Opinion in Case C-18/18 between Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek (an Austrian politician) and Facebook Ireland Limited. The politician had sought to have certain current and future content – argued to be defamatory – blocked by Facebook with worldwide effect. This is arguably the most important Internet speech-related case currently before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and will doubtlessly influence court reasoning far beyond Europe. This Comment analyses AG Szpunar’s interesting, but problematic, Opinion with particular emphasis on his reasoning in relation to the question of scope of jurisdiction; that is, what is the appropriate geographical scope of orders in these circumstances, rendered by a court that has personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Svantesson, D. A. N. (2019). Grading AG Szpunar’s opinion in case C-18/18 – A caution against worldwide content blocking as default. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, 13(2), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2019-2-10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free