Cognitive biases in cannabis, opioid, and stimulant disorders: A systematic review

18Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Opiates, cannabis, and stimulants are highly abused and are prevalent disorders. Psychological interventions are crucial given that they help individuals maintain abstinence following a lapse or relapse into substance use. The dual-process theory has posited that while the repeated use of a substance leads to increased automatic processing and increased automatic tendencies to approach substance-specific cues, in addition to the inhibition of other normal cognitive processes. Prior reviews are limited, as they failed to include trials involving participants with these prevalent addictive disorders or have not reviewed the published literature extensively. Objectives: The primary aim of this review is to synthesize the evidence for cognitive biases in opioid use, cannabis use, and stimulant use disorders. The secondary aim of the review is to determine if cognitive bias could be consistently detected using the different methods. Lastly, this review will narratively synthesize the evidence of possible associations between cognitive biases and other addiction-related outcomes. Methods: A search was conducted from November 2017 to January 2018 on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Science Direct, Cochrane Central, and Scopus. Articles were included if participants had a primary diagnosis of opioid use, cannabis use, or stimulant use disorder. The selection process of the articles was in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A qualitative synthesis was undertaken. Results: A total of 38 studies were identified. The main finding is the evidence that cognitive biases are present in the 38 studies identified, except for a single study on opioid use and stimulant use disorders. Cognitive biases were reported despite a variety of different methods being utilized. Synthesis of secondary outcome was not feasible, due to the varied outcomes reported. Conclusions: Cognitive biases have been consistently observed in opioid use, cannabis use, and stimulant use disorders, despite a range of assessment tools being utilized in the assessment for these biases.

References Powered by Scopus

Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences

1093Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Relationship Between Attentional Bias and Subjective Craving in Substance Abuse

492Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cognitive behavioral therapy for substance use disorders

377Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Heavy cannabis use, dependence and the brain: a clinical perspective

65Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The short-term and long-term effects of cannabis on cognition: recent advances in the field

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessment of Automatically Activated Approach–Avoidance Biases Across Appetitive Substances

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, M. W. B., Ying, J., Wing, T., Song, G., Fung, D. S. S., & Smith, H. E. (2018, August 15). Cognitive biases in cannabis, opioid, and stimulant disorders: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00376

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

66%

Researcher 6

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 22

54%

Medicine and Dentistry 13

32%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

7%

Neuroscience 3

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 11

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free