An in vivo platform to select and evolve aggregation-resistant proteins

28Citations
Citations of this article
141Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Protein biopharmaceuticals are highly successful, but their utility is compromised by their propensity to aggregate during manufacture and storage. As aggregation can be triggered by non-native states, whose population is not necessarily related to thermodynamic stability, prediction of poorly-behaving biologics is difficult, and searching for sequences with desired properties is labour-intensive and time-consuming. Here we show that an assay in the periplasm of E. coli linking aggregation directly to antibiotic resistance acts as a sensor for the innate (un-accelerated) aggregation of antibody fragments. Using this assay as a directed evolution screen, we demonstrate the generation of aggregation resistant scFv sequences when reformatted as IgGs. This powerful tool can thus screen and evolve ‘manufacturable’ biopharmaceuticals early in industrial development. By comparing the mutational profiles of three different immunoglobulin scaffolds, we show the applicability of this method to investigate protein aggregation mechanisms important to both industrial manufacture and amyloid disease.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ebo, J. S., Saunders, J. C., Devine, P. W. A., Gordon, A. M., Warwick, A. S., Schiffrin, B., … Brockwell, D. J. (2020). An in vivo platform to select and evolve aggregation-resistant proteins. Nature Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15667-1

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 44

58%

Researcher 26

34%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 40

56%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14

20%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 9

13%

Chemistry 8

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 6

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0