Purpose: To compare the degrees of marginal microleakage undergone by different intermediate materials used for provisional restoration in indirect pulp treatment: glass ionomers (Ketac™ Fil Plus (3M ESPE), Ketac™ Molar Easy Mix (3M ESPE), Fuji IX™ GP (GC)) and zinc oxide eugenol. Materials and methods: Twenty young permanent premolars, extracted for orthodontic reasons, were prepared by creating Class II cavities and then divided into four groups according to the material used for pulp capping. The materials were applied following the manufacturers' instructions and stained with methylene blue at 2% to evaluate microleakage. Results: Results were evaluated applying variance analysis (ANOVA). It was found that glass ionomers showed better outcomes than zinc oxide eugenol, with Fuji IX™ GP and Ketac™ Molar Easy Mix producing the best results. Conclusion: For indirect pulp capping, glass ionomer is a favorable material for reducing one of the main causes of treatment failure-microleakage-although there are differences between brands.
CITATION STYLE
Lillo, O. C., Lorente, A. A., & Pina, S. G. (2018). Microleakage of Glass Ionomers Temporary Restorations in Indirect Pulp Treatment: An in vitro Study. Open Journal of Dentistry and Oral Medicine, 6(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.13189/ojdom.2018.060101
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.