Accuracy and reliability of the kinect version 2 for clinical measurement of motor function

195Citations
Citations of this article
290Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background The introduction of low cost optical 3D motion tracking sensors provides new options for effective quantification of motor dysfunction. Objective The present study aimed to evaluate the Kinect V2 sensor against a gold standard motion capture system with respect to accuracy of tracked landmark movements and accuracy and repeatability of derived clinical parameters. Methods Nineteen healthy subjects were concurrently recorded with a Kinect V2 sensor and an optical motion tracking system (Vicon). Six different movement tasks were recorded with 3D full-body kinematics from both systems. Tasks included walking in different conditions, balance and adaptive postural control. After temporal and spatial alignment, agreement of movements signals was described by Pearson's correlation coefficient and signal to noise ratios per dimension. From these movement signals, 45 clinical parameters were calculated, including ranges of motions, torso sway, movement velocities and cadence. Accuracy of parameters was described as absolute agreement, consistency agreement and limits of agreement. Intra-session reliability of 3 to 5 measurement repetitions was described as repeatability coefficient and standard error of measurement for each system. Results Accuracy of Kinect V2 landmark movements was moderate to excellent and depended on movement dimension, landmark location and performed task. Signal to noise ratio provided information about Kinect V2 landmark stability and indicated larger noise behaviour in feet and ankles. Most of the derived clinical parameters showed good to excellent absolute agreement (30 parameters showed ICC(3,1) > 0.7) and consistency (38 parameters showed r > 0.7) between both systems. Conclusion Given that this system is low-cost, portable and does not require any sensors to be attached to the body, it could provide numerous advantages when compared to established markeror wearable sensor based system. The Kinect V2 has the potential to be used as a reliable and valid clinical measurement tool.

References Powered by Scopus

Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect sensor for measuring movement in people with Parkinson's disease

433Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparative abilities of Microsoft Kinect and Vicon 3D motion capture for gait analysis

428Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Principles of design and analyses for the calibration of accelerometry-based activity monitors

258Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evaluation of the pose tracking performance of the azure kinect and kinect v2 for gait analysis in comparison with a gold standard: A pilot study

190Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact assessment of reinforced learning methods on construction workers' fall risk behavior using virtual reality

161Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Applications and limitations of current markerless motion capture methods for clinical gait biomechanics

132Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Otte, K., Kayser, B., Mansow-Model, S., Verrel, J., Paul, F., Brandt, A. U., & Schmitz-Hübsch, T. (2016). Accuracy and reliability of the kinect version 2 for clinical measurement of motor function. PLoS ONE, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166532

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 126

69%

Researcher 30

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 17

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 70

46%

Computer Science 42

27%

Medicine and Dentistry 23

15%

Neuroscience 18

12%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 34

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free