Indication for Y Chromosome Microdeletion Analysis in Infertile Men: Is a New Sperm Concentration Threshold Needed?

3Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To describe the prevalence of Y-chromosome deletions in patients with a sperm concentration of less than 5 million/mL. To also determine a new sperm threshold for Y-chromosome analysis in men with infertility. Methods: A total of 3023 patients who had a semen concentration of less than 5 million/mL included in this retrospective study. All of these patients had a genetic evaluation, hormonal evaluation, and 2 abnormal semen analyses. Results: Y-chromosome deletions were present in 116 (3.8 %) patients with sperm concentration <5 million/mL. The frequency of a Y-chromosome deletions was 6.8%, 1.0%, 0.15% in azoospermic men, in men with sperm concentrations of 0-1 million /mL, in men with sperm concentrations of 1-5 million/mL. Patients were divided into 2 groups regarding the determined new sperm threshold. The sensitivity and specificity of the Y-chromosome deletions test were 92.2.7% and 49.3 %, 99.1%, and 22.1% in patients with azoospermia and sperm concentrations <1 million/mL, respectively. If the sperm concentration thresholds of azoospermia or <1 million/mL, are applied, the number of tests decreased to 50.5% (1442 tests) and 23.1% (643 tests), respectively. Approximately $108,150 and $48,225 would be saved if the sperm thresholds were azoospermia and <1 million/mL, respectively Conclusion: The current threshold of sperm concentration for Y-chromosome deletions is controversial. The new proposed sperm threshold for genetic testing of 1 million/mL would increase sensitivity and more cost-effective compared to the current threshold.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ortac, M., Ergul, R., Gurcan, M., Kalayci, T., Palanduz, S., Aydin, R., & Kadıoğlu, A. (2020). Indication for Y Chromosome Microdeletion Analysis in Infertile Men: Is a New Sperm Concentration Threshold Needed? Urology, 146, 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free