Do the paths of sequential vein grafts influence the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgeries?

1Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The use of a sequential vein graft (SVG) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in multi-vessel coronary disease is common. This study aimed to investigate the influence of the paths of SVGs on the outcomes of CABG. Methods: From January 2011 to June 2017, 126 patients underwent elective isolated CABG. If the path of the SVG was from the aorta to the right coronary artery (RCA)/ posterior descending artery (PDA) to the left circumflex artery (LCX)/obtuse marginal artery (OM), the patients were included in Group R. If the path was from the aorta to the LCX/OM to the RCA/PDA, the patients were included in Group L. The in-hospital and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. Results: Group R had 69 patients, and Group L had 57 patients. Univariate analysis showed that Group L had a higher number of grafts (P < .001) and less aortic crossclamping time (P < .001) and total bypass time (P = .001). Otherwise, Group L had 14 patients (19.3%), who received first diagonal branch (D1) bypass grafting, while Group R had none (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tseng, Y. H., Kao, C. C., Lin, C. C., Chen, C. W., Lu, M. S., Lu, C. H., & Huang, Y. K. (2020). Do the paths of sequential vein grafts influence the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgeries? Heart Surgery Forum, 23(1), E1–E6. https://doi.org/10.1532/hsf.2729

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free