A threshold of objectively-assessed daily sedentary time for all-cause mortality in older adults: A meta-regression of prospective cohort studies

27Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the shape of the dose-response association between objectively-assessed daily sedentary time (ST) and all-cause mortality, and to explore whether there is a threshold of ST above which there is an increase in mortality risk in older adults. Methods: Searches for prospective cohort studies providing e_ect estimates of daily ST (exposure) on all-cause mortality (outcome) were undertaken in five databases up to 31 March 2019. A random-e_ects meta-regression model was conducted to quantify the dose-response relationship between daily ST and all-cause mortality. Sensitivity analyses were also performed to test the stability of the results. Results: Our analysis of pooled data from 11 eligible studies did not reveal a consistent shape of association between ST and mortality. After excluding three studies with potential confounding bias, there was a log-linear dose-response relationship between daily ST and all-cause mortality. Overall, higher amounts of time spent in sedentary behaviors were associated with elevated mortality risks in older adults. Visual assessments of dose-response relationships based on meta-regression analyses indicated that increased mortality risks became significant when total ST exceeded approximately 9 h/day. Conclusions: Based on a limited number of studies, this meta-analysis provides a starting point for considering a cut-off of daily sedentary time, suggesting older adults spend less time in daily sitting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ku, P. W., Steptoe, A., Liao, Y., Hsueh, M. C., & Chen, L. J. (2019). A threshold of objectively-assessed daily sedentary time for all-cause mortality in older adults: A meta-regression of prospective cohort studies. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040564

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free