International Humanitarian Law and Bombing Campaigns: Legitimate Military Objectives and Excessive Collateral Damage

11Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite the introduction and increasing use of ‘smart’ bombs, recent bombing campaigns in Iraq, Afghanistan and Serbia, formerly known as the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY), have resulted in what some commentators consider to be an unacceptably high level of civilian casualties, especially when compared with the low level of combatant casualties in the attacking force. During the most recent Gulf conflict, a conservative estimate suggests that over 1,100 Iraqi civilians died within the first 2 months as a result of aerial bombardment or missile attacks by Coalition forces and that approximately another 600 civilians were killed by unexploded ordinance during the same period. There are no reliable statistics for civilians injured by aerial bombardment and unexploded ordinance in that period but the number is likely to have been many times higher than the number of fatalities. © 2010, T.M.C. Asser Instituut and the Authors. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Byron, C. (2010). International Humanitarian Law and Bombing Campaigns: Legitimate Military Objectives and Excessive Collateral Damage. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 13, 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-811-8_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free