Enhancing quality in diffusion tensor imaging with anisotropic anomalous diffusion filter

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an important medical imaging modality that has been useful to the study of microstructural changes in neurological diseases. However, the image noise level is a major practical limitation, in which one simple solution could be the average signal from a sequential acquisition. Nevertheless, this approach is time-consuming and is not often applied in the clinical routine. In this study, we aim to evaluate the anisotropic anomalous diffusion (AAD) filter in order to improve the general image quality of DTI. Methods: A group of 20 healthy subjects with DTI data acquired (3T MR scanner) with different numbers of averages (N=1,2,4,6,8, and 16), where they were submitted to 2-D AAD and conventional anisotropic diffusion filters. The Relative Mean Error (RME), Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), Coefficient of Variation (CV) and tractography reconstruction were evaluated on Fractional Anisotropy (FA) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps. Results: The results point to an improvement of up to 30% of CV, RME, and SSIM for the AAD filter, while up to 14% was found for the conventional AD filter (p<0.05). The tractography revealed a better estimative in fiber counting, where the AAD filter resulted in less FA variability. Furthermore, the AAD filter showed a quality improvement similar to a higher average approach, i.e. achieving an image quality equivalent to what was seen in two additional acquisitions. Conclusions: In general, the AAD filter showed robustness in noise attenuation and global image quality improvement even in DTI images with high noise level.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Senra Filho, A. C. D. S., Salmon, C. E. G., Dos Santos, A. C., & Murta Junior, L. O. (2017). Enhancing quality in diffusion tensor imaging with anisotropic anomalous diffusion filter. Research on Biomedical Engineering, 33(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1590/2446-4740.02017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free