An agenda for future research regarding the mental health of young people with care experience

6Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Young people who are currently or were previously in state care have consistently been found to have much higher rates of mental health and neurodevelopmental difficulties than the general youth population. While a number of high-quality reviews highlight what research has been undertaken in relation to the mental health of young people with care experience and the gaps in our knowledge and understanding, there is, until now, no consensus, so far as we aware, as to where our collective research efforts should be directed with this important group. Through a series of UK wide workshops, we undertook a consultative process to identify an agreed research agenda between those with lived experience of being in care (n = 15), practitioners, policy makers and researchers (n = 59), for future research regarding the mental health of young people with care experience, including those who are neurodiverse/have a neurodevelopmental difficulty. This consensus statement identified 21 foci within four broad categories: how we conceptualize mental health; under-studied populations; under-studied topics; and underused methodologies. We hope that those who commission, fund and undertake research will engage in this discussion about the future agenda for research regarding the mental health of young people with care experience.

References Powered by Scopus

110453Citations
79917Readers
Get full text
431Citations
791Readers

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Devaney, J., Power, L., Jacobs, P., Davidson, G., Hiller, R., Martin, J., … Thapar, A. (2023). An agenda for future research regarding the mental health of young people with care experience. Child and Family Social Work, 28(4), 960–970. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.13015

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

17%

Researcher 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

33%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

22%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

22%

Psychology 2

22%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0