If there is a second dimension of time – a so-called ‘hypertime’ – is it logically possible for the past to change? Some have said yes; others have said no. I say yes provided that one has the appropriate ontological view of hypertime. So far, the ontology of hypertime has seldom been discussed. As such, this paper not only defends the logical possibility of a changing past, but aims to start a discussion on what ontological commitments are required to make sense of a changing past.
CITATION STYLE
Law, A. (2019). The puzzle of hyper-change. Ratio, 32(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12197
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.