Diversity Management in Organizational Change: Towards a Systemic Framework

31Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Change is now a key concern of most business organizations, but the management of change (MOC) appears weak, with research suggesting that, at least in part, the methodologies used are responsible for this weakness. By outlining an alternative systemic MOC framework for action, and pointing to how this might be applied, this paper recommends an approach to MOC which seeks to address some of these current methodological shortcomings. A critical examination and classification of organizational change are conducted, leading to a categorization of approaches to change, and allowing critical assessment of the benefits and limitations of current approaches. Systems perspectives and their relevance to MOC are discussed, and by combining MOC and systems perspectives a systemic MOC framework is developed. This study suggests that MOC is characterized by diversity and interaction, for which systemic perspectives are more appropriate than the approaches currently applied. The systemic framework developed is thus seen to be a useful way of helping understand and manage organizational change more effectively. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
921Citations
441Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cao, G., Clarke, S., & Lehaney, B. (2003). Diversity Management in Organizational Change: Towards a Systemic Framework. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 20(3), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.530

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 56

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 13

15%

Researcher 9

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 52

68%

Social Sciences 10

13%

Computer Science 7

9%

Engineering 7

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0