Argues that research on modeling within science and technology should be cautious about approaching models in isolation, but rather should regard them as part of a complex, generative field. While there certainly may be rhetorical purposes for isolating a particular model to bring into relief a particular 'way of seeing' in the history of science, caution is essential if such a presentation of models doesn't become more a caricature of science. A plethora of books representing the history of science through a series of icons or great figures is an example. Other examples can be found in the misleading assimilation of T.S. Kuhn's idea of paradigms. Certain aspects of model-based reasoning might be learned from reading about the general cognitive field in which models emerge. The relation between models and diagrams is also discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
CITATION STYLE
Knoespel, K. J. (1999). Models and Diagrams within the Cognitive Field. In Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery (pp. 59–73). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_4
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.