Integration of various dimensions in food-based dietary guidelines via mathematical approaches: Report of a DGE/FENS Workshop in Bonn, Germany, 23-24 September 2019

11Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the past, food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) were derived nearly exclusively by using systematic reviews on diet-health relationships and translating dietary reference values for nutrient intake into foods. This approach neglects many other implications that dietary recommendations have on society, the economy and environment. In view of pressing challenges, such as climate change and the rising burden of diet-related diseases, the simultaneous integration of evidence-based findings from different dimensions into FBDGs is required. Consequently, mathematical methods and data processing are evolving as powerful tools in nutritional sciences. The possibilities and reasons for the derivation of FBDGs via mathematical approaches were the subject of a joint workshop hosted by the German Nutrition Society (DGE) and the Federation of European Nutrition Societies (FENS) in September 2019 in Bonn, Germany. European scientists were invited to discuss and exchange on the topics of mathematical optimisation for the development of FBDGs and different approaches to integrate various dimensions into FBDGs. We concluded that mathematical optimisation is a suitable tool to formulate FBDGs finding trade-offs between conflicting goals and taking several dimensions into account. We identified a lack of evidence for the extent to which constraints and weights for different dimensions are set and the challenge to compile diverse data that suit the demands of optimisation models. We also found that individualisation via mathematical optimisation is one perspective of FBDGs to increase consumer acceptance, but the application of mathematical optimisation for population-based and individual FBDGs requires more experience and evaluation for further improvements.

References Powered by Scopus

Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

3756Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials

627Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Global Review of Food-Based Dietary Guidelines

540Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Approximately Half of Total Protein Intake by Adults Must be Animal-Based to Meet Nonprotein, Nutrient-Based Recommendations, With Variations Due to Age and Sex

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Planetary Health Diet in contrast to the food-based dietary guidelines of the German Nutrition Society (DGE)

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From “good for people” to “good for people and planet” – Placing health and environment on equal footing when developing food-based dietary guidelines

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schäfer, A. C., Schmidt, A., Bechthold, A., Boeing, H., Watzl, B., Darmon, N., … Vieux, F. (2021, September 28). Integration of various dimensions in food-based dietary guidelines via mathematical approaches: Report of a DGE/FENS Workshop in Bonn, Germany, 23-24 September 2019. British Journal of Nutrition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114520004857

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

65%

Researcher 3

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

45%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

18%

Social Sciences 2

18%

Engineering 2

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free