The CETA ICS and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order in Opinion 1/17 - A Compass for the Future

9Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In April 2019, the Court of Justice of the EU ('CJEU') handed down its Opinion (C-1/17) on the compatibility of the Investment Court System ('ICS'), that is the Investor-State Dispute Settlement ('ISDS') mechanism under the EU-Canada Comprehensive and Economic Trade Agreement ('CETA'), with EU law. This article puts Opinion 1/17 in its broader (policy and legal) context, focusing on the salient issue of compatibility with the principle of autonomy of the EU legal order. It argues that the Court's openness to this judicial competitor was an acknowledgment of the need to maintain the powers of the Union in international relations. However, Opinion 1/17 should not be perceived as an automatic green light for any future investment court (such as the Multilateral Investment Court) as the autonomy test it introduces is a rather difficult one to pass.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fanou, M. (2020). The CETA ICS and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order in Opinion 1/17 - A Compass for the Future. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2020.4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free