Probabilistic Causality and Causal Generalizations

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

I argue that to the extent to which philosophical theories of objective probability have offered theoretically adequate conceptions of objective probability (in connection with such desiderata as causal and explanatory significance, applicability to single cases, etc.), they have failed to satisfy a methodological standard – roughly, a requirement to the effect that the conception offered be specified with the precision appropriate for a physical interpretation of an abstract formal calculus and be fully explicated in terms of concepts, objects or phenomena understood independently of the idea of physical probability. The significance of this, and of the suggested methodological standard, is then briefly discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eells, E. (2010). Probabilistic Causality and Causal Generalizations. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Vol. 284, pp. 3–44). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3615-5_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free