Protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation: Clinical outcome in patients randomized for a 30-min or 120-min trial with pressure support ventilation

119Citations
Citations of this article
145Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the possibility of successful extubation performing a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) in pressure support ventilation (PSV) with target durations of 30 and 120 min. Design and setting: Prospective and randomized study in two medical-surgical adult intensive care units. Patients and participants: 98 adult patients supported by mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h and considered ready for a weaning trial. Interventions: An SBT conducted in PSV with 7 cmH2O and patients randomly assigned to two groups with target durations of 30- and 120-min. Measurements and results: In the 30-min group 43 patients (93%) tolerated the SBT and were extubated while 4 (9%) needed reintubation within 48 h; in the 120-min group 46 patients (88%) successfully completed the trial and were extubated while 2 (4%) were reintubated. ICU mortality in the groups with short and long periods was 6% and 4%, and in-hospital mortality 20% and 17%, respectively. Those successful in the 30- and 120-min groups had similar length of ICU stay (6 and 7 days, respectively) and in-hospital length of stay (20 and 25 days, respectively). Compared to the successfully extubated, the reintubated patients had significantly higher length of ICU stay and mortality (17 vs. 6 days and 33 vs. 3.6%, respectively). Conclusions: An SBT with PSV of 7 cmH2O lasting 30 min is equally effective in recognizing the successfully extubated patients as a 120-min trial.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perren, A., Domenighetti, G., Mauri, S., Genini, F., & Vizzardi, N. (2002). Protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation: Clinical outcome in patients randomized for a 30-min or 120-min trial with pressure support ventilation. Intensive Care Medicine, 28(8), 1058–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-002-1353-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free