Low rate of and rapid attention to inappropriate ICD shocks with remote device and rhythm monitoring: a qualitative study

  • Sandgren E
  • Rorsman C
  • Engdahl J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Inappropriate shocks are unpleasant and painful. We hypothesise that remote monitoring and careful attention to known and incident atrial fibrillation (AF) can reduce inappropriate shocks to a very low level in clinical praxis. METHODS: Altogether 259 patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator implanted for secondary (S, n=113) and primary (P, n=146) prevention were followed via remote monitoring. At implant, 42S (37%) and 54P (37%) patients had known AF. RESULTS: Inappropriate shocks, all but five due to AF, occurred in 7S (6.2%) and 11P (7.5%), and there were only inappropriate shocks in 5/7S and in 8/11P. They occurred in four of 42S (9.5%) with and in three of 71S (4.2%) without known AF, and in seven of 54P (13%) with and in four of 92P (4.3%) without known AF. The median time from shock to action was 5 and 1 day, respectively. Actions were medication with amiodarone, beta blockers, beta blockers+amiodarone or beta blockers+digoxin (n=5), beta blockers+insertion of an atrial lead (n=1), replacement of a fractured lead (n=2), reprogramming in combination with beta blockers, digoxin or amiodarone (n=4), reprogramming (n=2) and none (n=4). After action, four further inappropriate shocks occurred during more than 2 years of follow-up, all due to AF. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate shocks occurred at a low rate and most often because of AF known at implant. Remote monitoring enabled rapid action, after which few inappropriate shocks occurred over more than 2 years. Attention to known and incident AF was the most important action to reduce inappropriate shocks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sandgren, E., Rorsman, C., Engdahl, J., & Edvardsson, N. (2015). Low rate of and rapid attention to inappropriate ICD shocks with remote device and rhythm monitoring: a qualitative study. Open Heart, 2(1), e000249. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2015-000249

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free