How Post-Positivism Sheds Light on Treaty Interpretation: Celebrating the VCLT Rule of Interpretation

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

What does post-positivism reveal about the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) rule of interpretation? This chapter argues that post-positivism can uncover the justificatory function of the VCLT rule of interpretation. Post-positivism delivers a hypothesis with explanatory value that is in line with international legal practice. It, therefore, provides further insights to the rule of interpretation. Post-positivism is characterised by a move away from the presumptions of positivism. Yet, it also remains in the tradition of positivism. This can be seen from reflection on the VCLT rule of interpretation. Post-positivism moves from ascertainment to argument. To structure communicative and argumentative processes becomes more important than hermeneutical guidance. Post-positivism leads to a potential pluralisation of actors. What is more, post-positivism is open for transdisciplinary insights. All these elements are visible in the reconstruction of the VCLT rule of interpretation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Djeffal, C. (2019). How Post-Positivism Sheds Light on Treaty Interpretation: Celebrating the VCLT Rule of Interpretation. In Law and Philosophy Library (Vol. 131, pp. 277–294). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24705-8_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free