Cost-effectiveness of Different Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Modalities

49Citations
Citations of this article
182Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Current screening strategies aimed at detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR) historically have poor compliance, but advancements in technology can enable improved access to care. Nearly 80% of all persons with diabetes live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), highlighting the importance of a cost effective screening program. Establishing mechanisms to reach populations with geographic and financial barriers to access is essential to prevent visual disability. Teleretinal programs leverage technology to improve access and reduce cost. The quality of currently employed screening modalities depends on many variables including the instrument used, use of pupillary mydriasis, number of photographic fields, and the qualifications of the photographer and image interpreter. Recent telemedicine and newer technological approaches have been introduced, but data for these technologies is yet limited. We present results of a systematic review of studies evaluating cost-effectiveness of DR screening, and discuss potential relevance for LMICs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pasquel, F. J., Hendrick, A. M., Ryan, M., Cason, E., Ali, M. K., & Narayan, K. M. V. (2016). Cost-effectiveness of Different Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Modalities. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 10(2), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296815624109

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free