Phase 2 study of combination SPI-1620 with docetaxel as second-line advanced biliary tract cancer treatment

15Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background:This multicentre, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of SPI-1620, an analogue of endothelin-1, administered in combination with docetaxel as second-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC).Methods:Eligible patients received continuous cycles of combination therapy with SPI-1620 (11 μg m '2) and docetaxel (75 mg m '2) intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression (PD) or intolerable toxicity. Tumour response was evaluated using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging every 2 cycles (6 weeks). The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, and overall survival (OS) that were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results:Of the 30 enrolled patients, 25 patients had qualifying events (PD or death), 1 patient was nonevaluable, and 4 patients were censored at the time of their last tumour assessment. Our primary end point of PFS 3/45 months was not reached. Median PFS was 2.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4-2.8), ranging from 0.7 to 8.4 months. The ORR was 10.3% (95% CI: 0.02-0.27). Eleven additional patients achieved stable disease. The OS was 4.87 months. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were febrile neutropenia and neutropenia.Conclusions:The addition of docetaxel to SPI-1620 in second-line ABTC did not meet the pre-specified primary end point of PFS 3/45 months in unselected patient population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, R., Chiorean, E. G., Amin, M., Rocha-Lima, C. M. S., Gandhi, J., Harris, W. P., … Portnoy, D. (2017). Phase 2 study of combination SPI-1620 with docetaxel as second-line advanced biliary tract cancer treatment. British Journal of Cancer, 117(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.160

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free