The context of correctness: A comment on rushton

8Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

According to Philippe Rushton, the "equalitarian fiction," a "scientific hoax" that races are genetically equal in cognitive ability, underlies the "politically correct" objections to his research on racial differences. He maintains that there is a taboo against race imequaled by the Inquisition. I show that while Rushton has been publicly harassed, he has had continuous opportunities to present his findings in diverse, widely available, respectable journals, and no general suppression within academic psychology is evident. Similarly, Henry Garrett and his associates in the IAAEE, dedicated to preserving segregation and preventing "race suicide," disseminated their ideas widely, although Garrett complained of the "equalitarian fiction" in 1961. Examination of the interhvined history of Mankind Quarterly, German Rassenhygiene, far right politics, and the work of Roger Pearson suggests that some cries of "political correctness" must be viewed with great caution. © 1996 Human Sciences Press, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Winston, A. S. (1996). The context of correctness: A comment on rushton. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 5(2), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02088001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free