Warning letters to sponsor- investigators at academic health centres - the regulatory "canaries in a coal mine"

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: This study highlights Warning Letter (WL) findings issued to sponsorinvestigators (S-Is) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Methods: The online index of WLs issued from October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2012 was reviewed [1]. Through a manual screening process, letters were evaluated if specifically issued to 'clinical investigators', 'sponsors' or 'sponsor-investigators'. A particular focus was given to S-Is at Academic Health Centres (AHCs). Each letter was scored for the presence of violations in 40 general regulatory categories. Results: A review of FDA WLs issued over afive-year period (FDA Fiscal Years 2008-2012) revealed that WLs to S-Is represent half of the WLs issued to all sponsors (16 of 32 letters). A review of these letters indicates that S-Is are not aware of, or simply do not meet, their regulatory responsibilities as either investigators or sponsors. In comparing total sponsor letters to those of S-Is, the most cited violation was the same: a lack of monitoring. A review of publicly available inspection data indicates that these 16 letters merely represent the tip of the iceberg. Conclusion: This review of the WL database reveals the potential for serious regulatory violations among S-Is at AHCs. Recent translational funding initiatives may serve to increase the number of S-Is, especially among Academic Health Centres (AHCs) [2]; thus, AHCs must become aware of this S-I role and work to support investigators who assume both roles in the course of their research. © 2013 CIM.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Reilly, E. K., Holbein, M. E. B., Berglund, J. P., Parrish, A. B., Roth, M. T., & Burnett, B. K. (2013). Warning letters to sponsor- investigators at academic health centres - the regulatory “canaries in a coal mine.” Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 36(6). https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v36i6.20626

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 2

40%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

20%

Computer Science 1

20%

Social Sciences 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0