Prevalência de Chlamydia trachomatis e fatores de risco associados à infecção detectada em amostra endocervical

7Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: It was to determine the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and the risk factors associated with infection in endocervical specimens from women seen in outpatient Obstetrics and Gynecology. Methods: Samples of endocervical secretion of 200 women treated at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Rio Grande were analyzed for the presence of C. trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers that amplify CT05/ CT06 281 base pairs of the main outer membrane protein of C. trachomatis. All participants completed a pre-coded and self-report questionnaire. Data were analyzed with the SPSS 17.0 software; for multivariate analysis it was used Poisson regression. Results: Of the 200 women who were included in the study, the prevalence of infection with C. trachomatis was 11% (22 patients) and these 55 (27.5%) were positive for HPV. Risk factors associated with infection by C. trachomatis were: 8 years or less of schooling (p<0.001), family income below the poverty level (p=0.005), first intercourse at age 15 or less (p=0.04) and being a carrier of the virus HIV (p<0.001). After multivariate analysis, only the variables of schooling or less than eight years (PR 6.0; 95%CI 1.26-29.0; p=0.02) and presence of HIV (RP 14.1; 95%CI 3.4-57.5; p<0.001) remained statistically significant. Conclusions: The prevalence of C. trachomatis in endocervical specimens by PCR was 11%. The factors associated with a higher infection by C. trachomatis were lower education and being HIV positive.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garcês, A. X., Martinez, A. M. B. de, Gonçalves, C. V., Germano, F. N., Barral, M. F. M., & Vieira, V. C. (2013). Prevalência de Chlamydia trachomatis e fatores de risco associados à infecção detectada em amostra endocervical. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 35(8), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032013000800008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free