Medical student research: An integrated mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis

187Citations
Citations of this article
333Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Importance: Despite the rapidly declining number of physician-investigators, there is no consistent structure within medical education so far for involving medical students in research. Objective: To conduct an integrated mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies about medical students' participation in research, and to evaluate the evidence in order to guide policy decision-making regarding this issue. Evidence Review: We followed the PRISMA statement guidelines during the preparation of this review and meta-analysis. We searched various databases as well as the bibliographies of the included studies between March 2012 and September 2013. We identified all relevant quantitative and qualitative studies assessing the effect of medical student participation in research, without restrictions regarding study design or publication date. Prespecified outcome-specific quality criteria were used to judge the admission of each quantitative outcome into the meta-analysis. Initial screening of titles and abstracts resulted in the retrieval of 256 articles for full-text assessment. Eventually, 79 articles were included in our study, including eight qualitative studies. An integrated approach was used to combine quantitative and qualitative studies into a single synthesis. Once all included studies were identified, a data-driven thematic analysis was performed. Findings and Conclusions: Medical student participation in research is associated with improved short- and long- term scientific productivity, more informed career choices and improved knowledge about-, interest in- and attitudes towards research. Financial worries, gender, having a higher degree (MSc or PhD) before matriculation and perceived competitiveness of the residency of choice are among the factors that affect the engagement of medical students in research and/or their scientific productivity. Intercalated BSc degrees, mandatory graduation theses and curricular research components may help in standardizing research education during medical school. Copyright:

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53191Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Health professionals for a new century: Ttransforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world

3653Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Benefits of undergraduate research experiences

996Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Contemporary global perspectives of medical students on research during undergraduate medical education: a systematic literature review

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Making Literature Reviews Work: A Multidisciplinary Guide to Systematic Approaches

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

NuCLS: A scalable crowdsourcing approach and dataset for nucleus classification and segmentation in breast cancer

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amgad, M., Tsui, M. M. K., Liptrott, S. J., & Shash, E. (2015, June 18). Medical student research: An integrated mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127470

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 91

59%

Professor / Associate Prof. 28

18%

Researcher 26

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 135

79%

Social Sciences 16

9%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

6%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 9

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 386

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free