Changing labels in the double-pushout approach can be treated categorically

4Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the double-pushout approach to graph transformations, most authors assume the left-hand side to be injective, since the noninjective case leads to ambiguous results. Taking into consideration productions that change labels, however, may add ambiguity even in the case of injective graph productions. A well-known solution to this problem is restricting the categorical treatment to the underlying graphs, whereas the labels on the derived graph are defined by other means. In this paper, we resume the detailed results on arbitrary left-hand sides that Ehrig and Kreowski have already given in 1976. We apply these results to the case of relabeling such that we can retain the elegant categorical constructions at the level of labeled graphs. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schneider, H. J. (2005). Changing labels in the double-pushout approach can be treated categorically. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3393 LNCS, 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31847-7_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free