Conclusion: What is the ‘value added’ of multi-method, transnational research?

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This concluding chapter reflects on the challenges of conducting ‘complex’ social science research using the experience of the MYPLACE project. It recognises the compromises to methodological conformism necessary for its successful implementation and seeks to elicit the ‘value adde’ gained. It explores, specifically, whether: the case study based survey allowed a more nuanced understanding of difference; the transnational comparison of qualitative data allowed conclusions to be drawn beyond the single case; and the triangulation of data brought new insight beyond that offered by survey or qualitative data alone. It concludes that the value added of the MYPLACE project is heightened elucidation of the meaning young people attach to politics and activism and thus why they choose, or choose not, to participate politically and civically.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pilkington, H., Franc, R., & Pollock, G. (2017). Conclusion: What is the ‘value added’ of multi-method, transnational research? In Understanding Youth Participation Across Europe: From Survey to Ethnography (pp. 317–329). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59007-7_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free