Recently municipal courts have found that foreign states do not enjoy jurisdictional immunity with respect to civil claims involving serious violations of international law within the forum state's territory during armed conflict. This article assesses the recent judgments' potential impact, taking into account previous court practice and international human rights jurisprudence. It concludes that an exception to immunity in the above circumstances where no alternative judicial remedies exist for the victims has a basis in previous practice and may be required to give effect to international human rights obligations. A recognition by the foreign state of an individual victims' right to bring a claim before that state's courts could provide the victims with reparation in the form of satisfaction. Where no such possibility exists, a limited exception to the rule of state immunity would ensure the victims' right to access to court and to the truth.
CITATION STYLE
Terzieva, V. (2022). State Immunity and Victims’ Rights to Access to Court, Reparation, and the Truth. International Criminal Law Review, 22(4), 780–804. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10139
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.