Usage of Multiple Process Assessment Models

11Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Organizations seek to obtain benefit from different process capability frameworks - the most popular ones as ISO/IEC 15504 and CMMI and the new ones as Enterprise SPICE - but every assessment is expensive both financially and time-wise. Furthermore, new assessment is required when a new process assessment model's version is released. In order to define and/or improve their software process, organizations choose different Software Development Methodologies. It is important for the organization to know what capability/maturity of the process a chosen methodology could ensure. In order to solve these problems, Transitional Process Assessment Model (TPAM) [1] has been proposed. It should enable the transformation of assessment results according to one Process Assessment Model to other models and determines what capability/maturity according to different Process Assessment Models a chosen methodology could ensure. The requirements for TPAM and its implementation principles have been introduced in [1]. This article presents the development of TPAM and supporting tool. The ideas of Enterprise SPICE integration into TPAM are outlined also. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peldzius, S., & Ragaisis, S. (2013). Usage of Multiple Process Assessment Models. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 349 CCIS, pp. 223–234). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38833-0_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free