Actual Situation of Thromboembolic Prophylaxis in Obesity Surgery: Data of Quality Assurance in Bariatric Surgery in Germany

  • Stroh C
  • Luderer D
  • Weiner R
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background . Evidence-based data on optimal approach for prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis (VTE) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in bariatric operations is discussed. Using antithrombotic prophylaxis weight adjusted the risk of VTE and its complications have to be balanced with the increased bleeding risk. Methods . Since 2005 the current situation for bariatric surgery has been examined by quality assurance study in Germany. As a prospective multicenter observational study, data on the type, regimen, and time course of VTE prophylaxis were documented. The incidences of clinically diagnosed VTE or PE were derived during the in-hospital course and follow up. Results . Overall, 11,835 bariatric procedures were performed between January 2005 and December 2010. Most performed procedures were 2730 gastric banding (GB); 4901 Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass (RYGBP) procedures, and 3026 sleeve gastrectomies (SG). Study collective includes 72.5% (mean BMI 48.1 kg/m 2 ) female and 27.5% (mean BMI 50.5 kg/m 2 ) male patients. Incidence of VTE was 0.06% and of PE 0.08%. Conclusion . VTE prophylaxis regimen depends on BMI and the type of procedure. Despite the low incidence of VTE and PE there is a lack of evidence. Therefore, prospective randomized studies are necessary to determine the optimal VTE prophylaxis for bariatric surgical patients.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stroh, C., Luderer, D., Weiner, R., Horbach, T., Ludwig, K., Benedix, F., … Manger, T. (2012). Actual Situation of Thromboembolic Prophylaxis in Obesity Surgery: Data of Quality Assurance in Bariatric Surgery in Germany. Thrombosis, 2012, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/209052

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 8

42%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

37%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

83%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

8%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

4%

Engineering 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free