Commentary Regarding Shapiro, "nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Insulin Dosing: Is It Safe?"

2Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The FDA recently expanded the approved use of Dexcom's G5 Mobile continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system to allow for diabetes treatment decisions. This decision is expected to reduce the burden of SMBG testing and increase the adoption and persistent use of CGM. The safety of nonadjunctive CGM use was questioned because of sporadic large discrepancies between CGM and SMBG values. These data were viewed in the context of complaints found in the FDA MAUDE database and social media postings. This commentary provides additional perspective on the inferences that can be drawn from these reports and the risk of nonadjunctive use of CGM data.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Price, D. (2017, July 1). Commentary Regarding Shapiro, “nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Insulin Dosing: Is It Safe?” Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296817695341

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free