The R package NonProbEst for estimation in non-probability surveys

3Citations
Citations of this article
231Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Different inference procedures are proposed in the literature to correct selection bias that might be introduced with non-random sampling mechanisms. The R package NonProbEst enables the estimation of parameters using some of these techniques to correct selection bias in non-probability surveys. The mean and the total of the target variable are estimated using Propensity Score Adjustment, calibration, statistical matching, model-based, model-assisted and model-calibratated techniques. Confidence intervals can also obtained for each method. Machine learning algorithms can be used for estimating the propensities or for predicting the unknown values of the target variable for the non-sampled units. Variance of a given estimator is performed by two different Leave-One-Out jackknife procedures. The functionality of the package is illustrated with example data sets.

References Powered by Scopus

Deep learning

64730Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system

33760Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

21292Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Why weight? Analytic approaches for large-scale population neuroscience data

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Methods to Counter Self-Selection Bias in Estimations of the Distribution Function and Quantiles

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A new technique for handling non-probability samples based on model-assisted kernel weighting

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rueda, M. del M., Ferri-García, R., & Castro, L. (2020). The R package NonProbEst for estimation in non-probability surveys. R Journal, 12(1), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.32614/rj-2020-015

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 60

66%

Researcher 13

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 10

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

44%

Social Sciences 12

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9

17%

Psychology 9

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 24

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free