Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: A prevalence study in south east England

241Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although there are now widely accepted diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) there are few epidemiological data. A prevalence study was performed in the four Thames health regions, population 14,049,850. The prevalence date was 1 January 1995. Data were from a national consultant neurologist surveillance programme and the personal case series of two investigators. A diagnosis of CIDP was made according to definite, probable, possible, or suggestive diagnostic criteria. A wide difference in prevalence rates between the four health regions was noted, probably due to reporting bias. In the South East Thames Region, from which the data were most comprehensive the prevalence for definite and probable cases was 1.00/100,000; the highest total prevalence (if possible and suggestive cases were included) would have been 1.24/100,000. On the prevalence date 13% of patients required aid to walk and 54% were still receiving treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lunn, M. P. T., Manji, H., Choudhary, P. P., Hughes, R. A. C., & Thomas, P. K. (1999). Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: A prevalence study in south east England. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 66(5), 677–680. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.66.5.677

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free