Ab initio computation of the mean inner Coulomb potential of amorphous carbon structures

21Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The mean inner Coulomb potential (MIP) of amorphous carbon structures was computed for slabs with mass densities between ρ=2.0 g/cm3 and ρ=3.5 g/cm3 by the full potential linearized augmented plane-wave (FLAPW) method. The amorphous carbon structures consisting of 64 carbon atoms were generated by a classical metropolis Monte Carlo procedure using the Tersoff potential for carbon. The MIP shows a linear dependence on the mass density. Values of the MIP of the amorphous carbon structures are compared with experimental values and with computed values for the MIP of graphite and diamond. © 2005 American Institute of Physics.

References Powered by Scopus

Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects

54906Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relativistic Hartree–Fock X‐ray and electron scattering factors

1948Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Empirical interatomic potential for carbon, with applications to amorphous carbon

1868Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The effect of dynamical scattering in off-axis holographic mean inner potential and inelastic mean free path measurements

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hybridization approach to in-line and off-axis (electron) holography for superior resolution and phase sensitivity

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Electron holography of thin amorphous carbon films: Measurement of the mean inner potential and a thickness-independent phase shift

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schowalter, M., Titantah, J. T., Lamoen, D., & Kruse, P. (2005). Ab initio computation of the mean inner Coulomb potential of amorphous carbon structures. Applied Physics Letters, 86(11), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1885171

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

65%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

15%

Researcher 3

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Materials Science 9

43%

Physics and Astronomy 9

43%

Chemistry 2

10%

Engineering 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free