11c-choline pet/ct vs.99mtc-mibi/123iodide subtraction spect/ct for preoperative detection of abnormal parathyroid glands in primary hyperparathyroidism: A prospective, single-centre clinical trial in 60 patients

10Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: In patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) locating hyperfunctioning glands (HPGs) is crucial when planning minimally invasive surgery. Dual-isotope subtraction scintigraphy with99mTc-MIBI/123Iodide using SPECT/CT and planar pinhole imaging (Method A) has previously shown a sensitivity >93%. However, the method is costly and time consuming and entails a high radiation dose.11C-Choline PET/CT (Method B) is an appealing candidate method unencumbered by these disadvantages. Methods: Sixty patients with newly diagnosed PHPT participated and were scanned using both methods prior to parathyroidectomy. We investigated whether sensitivities of Method A and Method B are similar in a method-to-method comparison when using surgical findings as the true location. Results: At the patient level, sensitivities were (A) 0.98 (95% CI: 0.90–1.00) and (B) 1.00 (95% CI: 0.93–1.00). At the gland level, sensitivities were (A) 0.88 (95% CI: 0.78–0.94) and (B) 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76–0.92). With a non-inferiority margin of ∆ = −0.1, we found a 1-sided p-value < 0.001. Conclusion: Our methods comparison study found that sensitivity of Method B was not inferior to Method A. We suggest that11C-Choline PET/CT is a clinically relevant first-choice candidate for preoperative imaging of PHPT and that Method B can likely replace Method A in the near future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ismail, A., Christensen, J. W., Krakauer, M., Søndergaard, S. B., Zerahn, B., Nygaard, B., … Jensen, L. T. (2020). 11c-choline pet/ct vs.99mtc-mibi/123iodide subtraction spect/ct for preoperative detection of abnormal parathyroid glands in primary hyperparathyroidism: A prospective, single-centre clinical trial in 60 patients. Diagnostics, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10110975

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free