Differences in Faculty Development Needs: Implications for Educational Peer Review Program Design

  • Toth K
  • McKey C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of faculty development in terms of the educational role is to assist faculty in becoming better educators. Educational peer review (EPR) is one method of faculty development. This article is based on a study that explored the different development needs of nursing faculty within a school of nursing at an Ontario university. The study explored on three variables of interest: level of skill acquisition, type of faculty appointment, and type of teaching. A qualitative research design in the case-study tradition was employed. Findings indicated that faculty challenges could be grouped into three themes: job knowledge, skills development, and systems challenges. Job knowledge and skills development challenges varied by level of skill acquisition and type of teaching, while identified systems challenges were related to type of appointment. A flexible EPR program that allows for some customization may lead to an increased ability to meet individual faculty development needs and greater faculty buy-in.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toth, K. E., & McKey, C. A. (1969). Differences in Faculty Development Needs: Implications for Educational Peer Review Program Design. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 40(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v40i1.1569

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free