A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway

23Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to propose and validate a new clinical score to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device. Methods The score was proposed from our previously reported derivation data, and we prospectively validated the score in 5532 patients from November 2013 to April 2014. Predictive accuracy of the score was compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). We assigned point values to each of the identified four risk factors: male, age >45 yr, short thyromental distance, and limited neck movement, their sum composing the score. The score ranged between 0 and 7 points. The optimal predictive level of the score was determined using ROC curve analysis. Results The AUC of the score was 0.75 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.84) in the validation data set, and was similar to that in the derivation data set (0.80; 95% CI 0.75 to 0.86). In derivation and validation data sets, the incidence of low risk categories (scores 0-3) was 0.42% vs 0.32% and of high risk categories (scores 4-7) was 3% vs 1.7% respectively. A score 4 or greater is associated with a six to seven fold increased risk of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device. Conclusions The new score for prediction of difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway device is easy to perform and reliable, and could help anaesthetists plan for difficult airway management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saito, T., Chew, S. T. H., Liu, W. L., Thinn, K. K., Asai, T., & Ti, L. K. (2016). A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 117, i83–i86. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew191

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free