Number-space associations without language: Evidence from preverbal human infants and non-human animal species

58Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It is well known that humans describe and think of numbers as being represented in a spatial configuration, known as the ‘mental number line’. The orientation of this representation appears to depend on the direction of writing and reading habits present in a given culture (e.g., left-to-right oriented in Western cultures), which makes this factor an ideal candidate to account for the origins of the spatial representation of numbers. However, a growing number of studies have demonstrated that non-verbal subjects (preverbal infants and non-human animals) spontaneously associate numbers and space. In this review, we discuss evidence showing that pre-verbal infants and non-human animals associate small numerical magnitudes with short spatial extents and left-sided space, and large numerical magnitudes with long spatial extents and right-sided space. Together this evidence supports the idea that a more biologically oriented view can account for the origins of the ‘mental number line’. In this paper, we discuss this alternative view and elaborate on how culture can shape a core, fundamental, number–space association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rugani, R., & de Hevia, M. D. (2017, April 1). Number-space associations without language: Evidence from preverbal human infants and non-human animal species. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. Springer Science and Business Media, LLC. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1126-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free