It is well known that humans describe and think of numbers as being represented in a spatial configuration, known as the ‘mental number line’. The orientation of this representation appears to depend on the direction of writing and reading habits present in a given culture (e.g., left-to-right oriented in Western cultures), which makes this factor an ideal candidate to account for the origins of the spatial representation of numbers. However, a growing number of studies have demonstrated that non-verbal subjects (preverbal infants and non-human animals) spontaneously associate numbers and space. In this review, we discuss evidence showing that pre-verbal infants and non-human animals associate small numerical magnitudes with short spatial extents and left-sided space, and large numerical magnitudes with long spatial extents and right-sided space. Together this evidence supports the idea that a more biologically oriented view can account for the origins of the ‘mental number line’. In this paper, we discuss this alternative view and elaborate on how culture can shape a core, fundamental, number–space association.
CITATION STYLE
Rugani, R., & de Hevia, M. D. (2017, April 1). Number-space associations without language: Evidence from preverbal human infants and non-human animal species. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. Springer Science and Business Media, LLC. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1126-2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.