Using case-based reasoning to support alternative dispute resolution

13Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recent trends in communication technologies led to a shift in the already traditional Alternative Dispute Resolution paradigm, giving birth to the Online Dispute Resolution one. In this new paradigm, technologies are used as a way to deliver better, faster and cheaper alternatives to litigation in court. However, the role of technology can be further enhanced with the integration of Artificial Intelligence techniques. In this paper we present UMCourt, a tool that merges concepts from the fields of Law and Artificial Intelligence. The system keeps the parties informed about the possible consequences of their litigation if their problems are to be settled in court. Moreover, it makes use of a Case-based Reasoning algorithm that searches for solutions for the litigation considering past known similar cases, as a way to enhance the negotiation process. When parties have access to all this information and are aware of the consequences of their choices, they can take better decisions that encompass all the important aspects of a litigation process. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carneiro, D., Novais, P., Andrade, F., Zeleznikow, J., & Neves, J. (2010). Using case-based reasoning to support alternative dispute resolution. In Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing (Vol. 79, pp. 123–130). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14883-5_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free