Barriers and facilitators to deprescribing of cardiovascular medications: A systematic review

17Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective To synthesise the current knowledge on barriers and facilitators to deprescribing cardiovascular medications (CVMs) at the levels of patients, informal caregivers and healthcare providers (HCPs). Design/setting We conducted a systematic review of studies exploring/assessing patient, informal caregiver and/or HCP barriers and/or facilitators to deprescribing CVMs. Data sources Ovid/MEDLINE and Embase from January 2003 to November 2021. Data extraction and synthesis We performed a deductive thematic analysis based on the framework of specific barriers and facilitators to deprescribing CVMs created by Goyal et al. We added a quantification of the occurrence of categories and themes in the selected articles to identify the resounding themes that indicate the greater impetus to address in future research. Results Most frequent deprescribing barriers for patients, informal caregivers and HCPs included uncertainty due to lack of evidence regarding CVM deprescribing (in n=10 studies), fear of negative consequences following deprescribing (n=13) and social influences (n=14). A frequently reported facilitator to deprescribing, especially for patients and informal caregivers, was the occurrence of adverse drug events (n=7). Another frequently reported facilitator for patients were dislike of CVMs (n=9). Necessity and benefit of CVMs were seen as barriers or facilitators similarly by patients and HCPs. Conclusion The differences in patient, informal caregiver and HCP regarding barriers and facilitators to deprescribing CVMs stress the need for ground discussions about beliefs and preferences of each stakeholder implicated in deprescribing decisions. Furthermore, HCP uncertainty regarding CVM deprescribing highlights the need to provide HCPs with tools that enable sharing the risks and benefits of deprescribing with patients and ensure a safe deprescribing process. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020221973.

References Powered by Scopus

Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein

5846Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study

5499Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emergency hospitalizations for adverse drug events in older Americans

1495Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Factors Important to Older Adults Who Disagree with a Deprescribing Recommendation

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Deprescribing medications among patients with multiple prescribers: A socioecological model

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Outcomes in deprescribing implementation trials and compliance with expert recommendations: a systematic review

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brunner, L., Rodondi, N., & Aubert, C. E. (2022). Barriers and facilitators to deprescribing of cardiovascular medications: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061686

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

71%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

14%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

7%

Materials Science 1

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0