Quantification of late gadolinium enhanced CMR in viability assessment in chronic ischemic heart disease: A comparison to functional outcome

75Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Quantification of late gadolinium enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE CMR) by objective window setting increases reproducibility and facilitates multicenter comparison and cooperation. So far, quantification methods or models have only been validated to postmortem animal studies. This study was undertaken to evaluate quantification of LGE in relation to the clinical standard of viability, i.e. functional outcome after revascularization. Thirty-eight patients with chronic ischemic myocardial dysfunction underwent cine and LGE 1 month before and cine CMR 6 months after coronary revascularization. Enhancement was quantified by thresholding window setting at: 2-8SD above mean signal intensity of a remote normal region, and according to the full width at half maximum method (FWHM). Dysfunctional segments were divided in 5 groups according to segmental extent of enhancement (SEE): SEE 1 - no enhancement to SEE 5 - 76-100% with each quantification method. Results: Quantification methods had a strong influence on SEE and total infarct size. Multilevel analysis showed that thresholding contrast images at 6SD best predicted segmental functional outcome after revascularization, but the difference with other methods was small and nonsignificant. Conclusion: Simple thresholding techniques strongly influence global and segmental extent of LGE, but have relatively little influence on the accuracy to predict segmental functional improvement after revascularization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beek, A. M., Bondarenko, O., Afsharzada, F., & Van Rossum, A. C. (2009). Quantification of late gadolinium enhanced CMR in viability assessment in chronic ischemic heart disease: A comparison to functional outcome. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-11-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free