Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review

2Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Efficacy studies show early nutrition interventions improving infant nutrition status, but understanding caregiver acceptability is required for implementation of such interventions. This systematic review examines caregivers' perceptions of nutrition interventions in young children. Design: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO from date of online journal inception through December 2020. Interventions included oral (powder/liquid/tablet) and/or intravenous supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Inclusion criteria included primary research, data presented on caregiver perception and studies published in English. Quality assessment was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Studies underwent narrative synthesis using inductive thematic analysis. Setting: No restriction. Participants: Caregivers of children under 24 months of age. Results: Of 11 798 records identified, thirty-seven publications were included. Interventions included oral supplementation, food fortification and nutrition counselling. Caregivers included mothers (83 %), fathers, grandparents and aunts. Perceptions were gathered through individual interviews, focus group discussions, questionnaires, surveys and ratings. Totally, 89 % of studies noted high acceptability (n 33 most notably increased appetite (n 17). In total, 57 % of studies (n 21) cited low acceptability, commonly from side effects (n 13) such as gastrointestinal issues, appetite loss and stained teeth. Conclusions: Positive perceptions and enthusiasm for interventions were frequently reported. Key to implementation was the increased appetite noted by caregivers. A substantial proportion of studies reported negative perceptions, mainly due to side effects. In future interventions, mitigation and education around common side effects are crucial for acceptability. Understanding both positive and negative caregiver perceptions is important for informing future nutrition interventions and strengthening sustainability and implementation.

References Powered by Scopus

Using thematic analysis in psychology

110319Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

22272Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival

1551Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Daily iron supplementation does not impact on prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding or growth in young breastfed Gambian infants

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Novel Self-Retentive Obturator to Facilitate Feeding in an Infant with Cleft Palate: A Case Report and Literature Review

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stelle, I., Kinshella, M. L. W., & Moore, S. E. (2023, September 23). Caregiver perceptions of nutrition interventions in infants and children under 24 months of age: a systematic review. Public Health Nutrition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980023001246

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

56%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

22%

Chemistry 1

11%

Social Sciences 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0