The chronic clinical setting

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The past 15 years have provided an unprecedented collection of discoveries that have increased our scientific understanding of recovery of human consciousness following severe brain damage. Differentiating between patients in “unresponsive/vegetative” and minimally conscious states still represents a major challenge with profound ethical concerns in terms of medical management. Valid diagnosis is of highest importance in chronic clinical settings, relying on standardized behavioral assessments and neuroimaging paradigms to detect subtle signs of consciousness. An improved assessment of brain function in coma and related states is not only changing nosology and medical care, but also offers a better-documented diagnosis and prognosis and helps to further identify the neural correlates of human consciousness. Recent treatment interventions aimed at accelerating the recovery of awareness show encouraging results, with improvements of behavioral signs of consciousness of severely brain-injured patients. These new insights in this field also raise new legal questions regarding treatment strategies, rehabilitation, and end-of-life decisions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Charland-Verville, V., Laureys, S., Gosseries, O., Thibaut, A., & Bruno, M. A. (2015). The chronic clinical setting. In Clinical Neurophysiology in Disorders of Consciousness: Brain Function Monitoring in the ICU and Beyond (pp. 95–106). Springer-Verlag Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1634-0_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free