Long-term survival and health-related quality of life of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

27Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: the outcome of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) patients is most frequently measured as operative or in-hospital mortality rate. However, survival alone is not an indicator of quality of the treatment. Assessment of quality of life (QoL) is used increasingly and is a relevant measure of outcome. Objective: to assess long-term survival and QoL of patients undergoing repair of RAAA. Design: follow-up study with cross-sectional QoL evaluation. Materials and methods: between 1996 and 2000, 199 of 220 patients with RAAA underwent surgery. Survivors were sent the generic the RAND 36-item Health Survey (RAND-36) self-administered questionnaire. Results: total hospital mortality and operative mortality were 103 of 220 (47%) and 82 of 199 (41%). Of the 117 initial survivors, 21 were deceased at the time of the study. When compared to an age- and sex-adjusted general population, only physical functioning was significantly impaired (p = 0.01) in the 82 of 93 (88%) RAAA survivors who responded. Conclusions: survivors after repair of RAAA had almost the same QoL as the norms of an age- and sex-adjusted general population, justifies an aggressive operative policy in RAAA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Korhonen, S. J., Kantonen, I., Pettilä, V., Keränen, J., Salo, J. A., & Lepäntalo, M. (2003). Long-term survival and health-related quality of life of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 25(4), 350–353. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvs.2002.1880

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free