The relative value of operon predictions

86Citations
Citations of this article
128Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

For most organisms, computational operon predictions are the only source of genome-wide operon information. Operon prediction methods described in literature are based on (a combination of) the following five criteria: (i) intergenic distance, (ii) conserved gene clusters, (iii) functional relation, (iv) sequence elements and (v) experimental evidence. The performance estimates of operon predictions reported in literature cannot directly be compared due to differences in methods and data used in these studies. Here, we survey the current status of operon prediction methods. Based on a comparison of the performance of operon predictions on Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis we conclude that there is still room for improvement. We expect that existing and newly generated genomics and transcriptomics data will further improve accuracy of operon prediction methods. © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brouwer, R. W. W., Kuipers, O. P., & Van Hijum, S. A. F. T. (2008). The relative value of operon predictions. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 9(5), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbn019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free