Removal of the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) glycosylphosphatidylinositol signal sequence from a CSP DNA vaccine enhances induction of CSP-specific Th2 type immune responses and improves protection against malaria infection

41Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The C terminus of the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) is anchored to the parasite cell membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) glycolipid. This GPI signal sequence functions poorly in heterologous eukaryotic cells, causing CSP retention within internal cell organelles during genetic immunization. Cellular location of antigen has quantitative and qualitative effects on immune responses induced by genetic immunization. Removal of the GPI signal sequence had a profound effect on induction and efficacy of CSP-specific immune response after genetic immunization of BALB/c mice with a gene gun. The CSP produced from the plasmid lacking the GPI anchor signal sequence (CSP-A) was secreted and soluble, but that produced by the CSP+A plasmid was not. The CSP-A plasmid induced a highly polarized Th2 type response, in which the CSP-specific IgG antibody titer was three- to fourfold higher, and the protective effect was significantly greater than that induced by the CSP+A plasmid. Thus, these two physical forms of CSP induced quantitatively and qualitatively different immune responses that also differed in protective efficacy. Engineering plasmid constructs for proper cellular localization of gene products is a primary consideration for the preparation of optimally efficacious DNA vaccines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scheiblhofer, S., Chen, D., Weiss, R., Khan, F., Mostböck, S., Fegeding, K., … Lyon, J. A. (2001). Removal of the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) glycosylphosphatidylinositol signal sequence from a CSP DNA vaccine enhances induction of CSP-specific Th2 type immune responses and improves protection against malaria infection. European Journal of Immunology, 31(3), 692–698. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4141(200103)31:3<692::AID-IMMU692>3.0.CO;2-Y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free