Transtubular Anterior Cervical Foraminotomy for the Treatment of Compressive Cervical Radiculopathy: Surgical Results and Complications in a Consecutive Series of Cases

7Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Study Design: This was a retrospective review of patients with compressive cervical radiculopathy treated with a minimally invasive anterior cervical foraminotomy (ACF).Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the results and complication rates of ACF in a consecutive series of patients and to report ourclinical results of ACF as a minimally invasive technique in a series of 45 consecutive patients treated for compressive cervical radiculopathy.Overview of Literature: ACF is a motion-sparing procedure and an alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) andposterior cervical foraminotomy for direct nerve root decompression in patients with compressive cervical radiculopathy.Methods: The chart review recorded clinical and radiological features preoperatively and postoperatively and at follow-up (FU). Theeffect of prognostic factors was analyzed in relation to the clinical outcome.Results: Between January 2004 and October 2019, 45 patients (15 females and 30 males) with a mean age of 55.9 years (range,28–78 years) underwent ACF for unilateral cervical radiculopathy. The global clinical outcome according to the MacNab scale wasevaluated as excellent in 64.5% of patients (n=29), good in 28.9% (n=13), fair in 4.4% (n=2), and poor in 2.2% (n=1). The radiologicalFU was available for 73.3% (n=33). The statistical analysis revealed no influence of age, sex, operated level, and side on the clinicaloutcome. Only one patient (2.2%) exhibited spontaneous bone fusion at the operated level on FU after a right-sided C6–7 ACF withno clinical consequences. No patient presented with signs of delayed segmental instability. The overall reoperation rate of this serieswas 4.4%.Conclusions: ACF is a feasible and low-cost alternative to ACDF in selected patients with cervical radiculopathy. The use of tubularretractors in ACF may confer an added advantage that creates a safe corridor for direct cervical root decompression yet minimizingsurrounding soft tissue retraction and avoiding unnecessary bone removal

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maduri, R., Cossu, G., Aureli, V., Wüthrich, S. P., Bobinski, L., & Duff, J. M. (2021). Transtubular Anterior Cervical Foraminotomy for the Treatment of Compressive Cervical Radiculopathy: Surgical Results and Complications in a Consecutive Series of Cases. Asian Spine Journal, 15(5), 673–681. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0323

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free