Cardiorespiratory optimal point in post-COVID-19 patients: a cross-sectional study

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The varied clinical presentations of SARS-CoV-2 infection have raised concerns about long-term consequences, especially “long-COVID” or “post-COVID-19 syndrome.” In this context, the cardiorespiratory optimal point (COP) within the Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) emerges as a crucial metric for evaluating functional capacities and detecting cardiovascular and pulmonary anomalies post-COVID-19. This study aimed to assess COP values among post-COVID-19 patients and categorized them based on the initial severity of their disease. In this cross-sectional study conducted in the Northeast Brazil, 80 patients (26 females and 54 males) previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 underwent CPET. We clinically stratified patients into mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19 categories and assessed COP values and other cardiorespiratory metrics. We found differences in the predicted COP between patients with mild and severe COVID-19 (p=0.042). Additionally, patients with moderate and severe COVID-19 record had an average COP value exceeding 22. Other parameters, including respiratory exchange ratio, heart rate, and oxygen uptake efficiency slope, did not differ across the groups. Patients with a history of severe COVID-19 showed altered COP values, suggesting potential discrepancies in cardiovascular and respiratory system integration. The outcomes emphasize the importance of continuous monitoring and assessment of the cardiorespiratory domain for post-COVID-19 patients. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between elevated COP in post-severe COVID-19 and its long-term prognostic implications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Da Cruz Santos, K. S., Gonçalves De Brito, G. M., De Melo, E. V., Sousa, A. C. S., Martins-Filho, P. R., & Barros Campos, M. D. S. (2024). Cardiorespiratory optimal point in post-COVID-19 patients: a cross-sectional study. Revista Do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 66. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-9946202466014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free